No hate. No violence
Races? Only one Human race
United We Stand, Divided We Fall
Radio Islam
Know Your enemy!
No time to waste. Act now!
Tomorrow it will be too late

English

Franç.

Deutsch

Arabic

Sven.

Español

Portug.

Italian

Russ.

Bulg.

Croat.

Czech

Dansk

Finn.

Magyar

Neder.

Norsk

Polski

Rom.

Serb.

Slov.

Indon.

Türk.

汉语
http://www3.haaretz.co.il/eng/scripts/article.asp?mador=4&datee=6/17/01&id=121571

Just when we were about to give them so much

By Gideon Levy, Ha'aretz 06/17/2001

So how did it happen that just when we were about to give the Palestinians so much, the new Intifada broke out? How is it that precisely after they received from Ehud Barak the most far-reaching offer ever made by an Israeli prime minister they turned to violence?

The standard, and mistaken, Israeli answer is that the reason is simple: The Palestinians don't want peace, or they are not ripe for peace. By citing this reply, the Israelis make things easy for themselves and absolve themselves of responsibility for what happened. And the remnants of the left exempt themselves from their commitment. The truth is that Israel bears not a little responsibility for the eruption of the present cycle of violence, no less in fact than that borne by the Palestinians. Israel did indeed make the "most generous offer" to the Palestinians, but it was not enough to achieve a just solution, and what preceded it was too much for the Palestinians too swallow.

Reminder: For the three years of Benjamin Netanyahu's government, Israel evaded implementing the majority of its commitments under the 1993 Declaration of Principles. There was no second redeployment, no release of prisoners as agreed, no "safe passage" route, no Palestinian airport or seaport, while on the other hand there were more and more settlements. The spirit of Oslo ceased and was replaced by an evil spirit of despair and disappointment on the Palestinian side. From their point of view, there seemed to be no true partner for peace.

Netanyahu's successor, in 1999, did not alleviate their situation. Barak took pride in declaring that he did not give the Palestinians even one centimeter of land, not even Abu Dis, adjacent to Jerusalem, which even the Knesset agreed to forgo - a rather strange display of pride for a peacemaker. Indeed, Barak began by embarking on the Syrian track, and only after it proved to be blocked did he swerve onto the other track and seek a permanent agreement with the Palestinians.

An expert in dismantling watches but inept as putting them back together, Barak put forward proposals that most Israelis considered daring, but which could not be acceptable to a Palestinian leader who is going to sign a declaration of the end of the conflict and the end of Palestinian claims. Are we talking about 96 percent of the territory?

Salim Shawamreh, a driver from the village of Anabta, whose house was demolished by Israel three times, probably described the characteristics of the generous Israeli proposal better than any statesman: In jail, too, 96 percent of the territory is in the hands of the prisoners, Shawamreh said of the demolition of his home, and the warders have only 4 percent, but it's there that the fences and the watchtowers are located.

That was what the Israeli proposal resembled in Palestinian eyes - a Palestinian state with tight Israeli control over the gateways: split into small sections by blocs of settlements that would preclude a normal way of life and free movement. And on top of that came the lack of a serious Israeli effort to solve the refugee problem and an unwillingness to recognize Israeli responsibility - albeit not exclusive responsibility - for the refugees' fate.

After the Palestinians agreed to their major historic concession at Oslo - recognition of the fact that most of the territory that was once their country would remain in Israel's hands - one truly generous and unavoidable offer was needed: the return of all the territories occupied since 1967, perhaps in a territorial trade-off. Barak did not make any such offer to the Palestinians. When he came to his senses at Taba, a few days before the elections, it was already too late. Afterward, Barak's foreign minister, Shlomo Ben-Ami, related that the sides were very close to an agreement at Taba; and Yossi Beilin reported tremendous progress even on the subject of the refugees' right of return. But it was all far too late.

Not that the Palestinians didn't make mistakes. Their mistakes are too many to bear, beginning with a lack of sensitivity for the issue of personal security in Israel. And not that the Americans didn't make mistakes. Ben-Ami says the president was not authoritative and aggressive enough, particularly toward the Palestinians. At the same time, underlying the negotiations were two basic Israeli approaches, which remained totally unchanged in the 34 years of the occupation: a concept of lordship and inequality with respect to the Palestinians, and the assessment that we are in a zero-sum game, in which every gain made by the Palestinians comes at Israel's expense.

In a comprehensive article, which will soon be published in the United States, Dr. Ron Pundak, one of the architects of the Oslo process, also reaches the conclusion that the major obstacles, even if not all of them, that blocked an agreement derived from Israeli policy. His article seeks to refute the thesis that the Oslo process collapsed and failed; and at the same time it refutes the new position taken by the Israeli left, namely that the right wing is correct in its conclusion that Israel has no partner for peace. Pundak finds that there is a Palestinian partner and that it is important to say so precisely now, and that Israel only needs to be aware of the limits of the Palestinians' maneuverability.

At the time Barak made his take-it-or-leave-it offer, the occupation continued as usual. The closure went on, land was expropriated, prisoners - heroes in the eyes of their people - remained incarcerated in Israeli jail cells, settlements were expanded. During the 18 months of the Barak government, the number of settlers increased by 12 percent. Barak also shied away, as from fire, from any unnecessary contact with Yasser Arafat - yet another bizarre decision, which weakened the Palestinian leader. The Palestinians' economic situation deteriorated, their humiliation was intensified. This entire course of events could only end in disaster, as it did.


"When a Jew, in America or in South Africa, talks to his Jewish companions about 'our' government, he means the government of Israel."

- David Ben-Gurion, Israeli Prime Minister


Palestine banner
Viva Palestina!

Latest Additions - in English

What is this Jewish carnage really about? - The background to atrocities

Videos on Farrakhan, the Nation of Islam and Blacks and Jews 

How Jewish Films and Television Promotes bias Against Muslims

Judaism is Nobody's Friend
Judaism is the Jews' strategy to dominate non-Jews.

Islam and Revolution
By Ahmed Rami

Jewish Manipulation of World Leaders - Photos

Elie Wiesel - A Prominent False Witness
By Robert Faurisson

The Gaza atrocity 2008-2009


Iraq under Jewish occupation
Iraq - war and occupation


Jewish War against Lebanon!

Jew Goldstone appointed by UN to investigate War Crimes in Gaza

Hasbara - The Jewish manual for media deceptions

Britain under Jewish occupation!


Jewish World Power
West Europe    East Europe
Americas          Asia
Middle East       Africa
      U.N.              E.U.

 

The Internet and Israeli-Jewish infiltration/manipulations

Books - Important collection of titles

The Power of Jews in France

The Israel Lobby - From the book

Jews and Crime  - The archive!

When Jews rule...
The best book on Jewish Power


Sayanim - Israel's and Mossad's Jewish helpers abroad

Listen to Louis Farrakhan's Speech - A must hear!

The Israeli Nuclear Threat

The "Six Million" Myth

Jewish "Religion" - What is it?

Medias in the hands of racists

Strauss-Kahn - IMF chief and member of Israel lobby group

Down with Zio-Apartheid
StopJewish Apartheid!

The Jews behind Islamophobia

Israel controls U.S. Presidents
Trump, Obama, Bush, Clinton...

The Victories of Revisionism
By Professor Robert Faurisson

The Jewish hand behind Internet The Jews behind Google, Facebook, Wikipedia, Yahoo!, MySpace, eBay...

"Jews, who want to be decent human beings, have to renounce being Jewish"

Jewish War Against Iran

Al Jazeera English under Jewish infiltration

The Founding Myths of Modern Israel
Garaudy's "Founding myths"


Jewish hate against Christians
By Prof. Israel Shahak

Introduction to Revisionist
Thought
- By Ernst Zündel

Karl Marx: The Jewish Question

Reel Bad Arabs - Revealing the racist Jewish Hollywood propaganda

"Anti-Semitism" - What is it?

Videos - Important collection 

The Jews Banished 47 Times in 1000 Years - Why?

Nation of Islam and The Synagogue of Satan - Videos

The International Jew - By Henry Ford

Pravda interviews Ahmed Rami

The Founding Myths of Modern Israel
Shahak's "Jewish History"


The Jewish plan to destroy the Arab countries - From the World
Zionist Organization

Judaism and Zionism inseparable

"Jewish History" - a bookreview

Revealing photos of the Jews 

Racist Jewish Fundamentalism

"Jews" from Khazaria stealing the land of Palestine

The U.S. cost of supporting Israel

Turkey, Ataturk and the Jews

Talmud unmasked
The truth about the Talmud


Israel and the Ongoing Holocaust in Congo

Jews DO control the media - a Jew brags! - Revealing Jewish article

Abbas - The Traitor

Protocols of Zion - The whole book!

Quotes - On Jewish Power / Zionism

Caricatures / Cartoons 

Activism! - Join the Fight!