|
This is written on March 18th 2003, the day after the day George Bush
II declared a 'Day of Truth', with all the chutzpah of the Devil declaring
a 'Day of Virtue'.
Taking the President at his word (for who would declare himself as an
opponent of this unstable bully without good reason?) here's one contribution
to the cause of truth - followed by a few suggestions for action.
For clarity's sake, we've stripped down some of our 'core beliefs' to
the barest essentials.
Both are grounded in that most potent of contemporary symbols, 9-1-1.
* First, 9/11 was a staged atrocity (1), planned by criminals who
are edging closer to a monopoly of power on this planet. The same applies
to many of the most memorable events of recent decades, such as the JFK
assassination. 9/11 was a high-level conspiracy - not a cock-up. It was
certainly not what it has been portrayed as - an attack by Moslem fanatics
on America. That portrayal is a gigantic and very evil hoax.
* Second, 9/11 was a significant milestone in the emergence of
a fascistic society (2). The wealth and military might of this monster
is based in the USA. Ideologically, it is rooted in Zionism. Its reach
and aspirations are increasingly global.
Newcomers to these ideas may find them fantastical, implausible and defamatory.
The last of these, of course, is a legal matter. One can only speculate
whether and when these beliefs may become criminalized, akin to the criminalization
of open discourse on topics such as 'The Holocaust'. Certainly, they are
marginalized already - effectively embargoed by the mainstream media…
Yet, if one follows the trail of evidence (3), the case is strong. This
website (Feral News) attempts to present
some of the key evidence - and links to other cutting edge information
available on the web. As always we invite critical response. Show us where
we're wrong and we'll be delighted to correct the record. We don't hold
these beliefs for fun. It was much, much nicer to inhabit the pre-9/11
world, before the scales dropped from the eyes of so many people around
the world. It was a crazy and sad world, it's true, but not a world in
which pure evil is so ascendant and organized as we discover it to be.
In recent weeks, it's become obvious that the drive to invade Iraq is
a campaign led by Zionists (4). This theme, a relatively rare and highly
risqué statement a few months ago, has become a chorus. It's not yet deafening,
but taboo on discussing the 'elephant' of Zionist power has been well
and truly broken.
A vigorous debate (5) is now underway on whether this analysis is sufficient.
Should it be broadened to a critique and exposure of organized Jewry as
a whole? This topic, once the lonely passion of right-wing 'white' racists
and a handful of persecuted 'revisionist' historians, is now entering
general discourse. The debate occurs only, of course, where it's allowed
to take place. Beyond local and personal networks this means the Internet.
But for the first time in recent decades, it is a debate involving significant
numbers of people who identify with the democratic left and other sectors
of society previously strongly averse to notions of 'Zionist' or 'Jewish'
conspiracies. A talkboard (6) such as the Guardian's - Britain's left-of-center
newspaper - is indicative. Its 'international' section now sports thread
after thread on the topics of Zionist and Jewish power; they keep being
pruned by the talkboard moderators, but pop up again and again like toadstools
after an evening shower, linking better-informed leftish Britons - and
others who use the bulletin board - to the plethora of independent websites
addressing these matters. The word is well and truly out…
For this reason, even on the eve of the latest threatened invasion of
Iraq (how often we overlook earlier invasions, and threats of invasions,
by the Anglo-American military machine!), this is a time of great opportunity.
That's scant comfort for the Iraqis in the immediate plight, but may yet
lead to salvation for humanity. In going for broke, in reaching for full
control, those whom Israel Shamir calls the 'masters of discourse' have
been forced to reveal their visage - at least to an awaken minority. Most
people, to date, continue to go about their normal lives as though nothing
has changed. "Ho hum, ho hum, what elephant? What's happening in the baseball
final? Who's winning the golf? Can I meet my mortgage payment? How hum,
ho hum, what elephant?" But more and more of us are shouting 'elephant!'
And of course, that spells danger for an animal which might be ejected
to a more suitable location than the living room if only its slumbering
roommates realize it is there.
But is the danger all on one side? Obviously not. Internet discussions,
email exchanges - almost any use of globally networked computers - can
be monitored and the identity of participants established (7). Those in
charge of the emerging police state are unlikely to be discarding this
information. Starved of an outlet in the mass media, the internet has
become primary channel for critical discussion of issues such as the Mossad
spy-ring in the USA, the existence of sayanim (8) in 'western' countries,
the many anomalies of 9/11, the anthrax scam, the Bali bombings, etc,
etc.
Should this stop us from our attempts to use the web, email and other
telecommunications to learn, inform and organize? It's tempting to say
'no' and leave it at that. Surely this is no time for a faint-hearted
approach? The anti-Zionist Jewish Canadian philosopher Michael Neumann
exhorts American gentiles to "take a f****** risk" (9). Perhaps all informed
anti-Zionists should follow his advice?
We don't presume to proffer advice on this topic, because we really don't
know. It's no longer inconceivable that there will be amore or less rapid
'round up ' of dissenters, so easily identifiable through their internet
use. The legal machinery to do so is now largely in place in each of the
three main English-speaking aggressor nations - the USA, Britain and Australia.
If Patriot Act Mark 2 is enacted in anything resembling it's current form,
the USA will effectively have become a police state.
These are uncharted waters for humanity. Having just awoken to the existence
of the enormous beast, which has perfected the art of hexing other slumbering
animals in the living room of our Animal Farm and which, in Orwell's metaphor,
turns out on closer inspection to be a giant-sized pig - it would be foolish
to underestimate this monster, which is clearly very cunning, powerful
and breathtakingly ruthless. Perhaps some folk should be well-informed
but unwired and largely unidentified. We may need a mix of strategies.
Everyone must make their own decision on this, based on circumstances
and conscience.
But for those of us already effectively 'outed', there is no way back.
We must push on and get better and more effective at communicating and
organizing. This is a struggle more important than any before on planet
earth. A planetary struggle, indeed, between good and evil, in true Hollywood
style but with the usual Hollywood heroes and villains in reverse.
A few more reflections on the way forward, put forward as contributions
to the debate, Proposals to consider and adopt if deemed useful and appropriate.
Establishing Anti-Zionist Political Parties
Activists in 'democratic' countries may need to establish explicitly anti-Zionist
political parties.
There is precedent in US history; the third major political party to evolve
and flourish briefly in the first quarter of US history was the 'Anti-Masonic
Party' (10).
Globally-linked 'Anti-Zionist' parties, at first thought a very bizarre
idea, might be a crucial tool for education and for wresting power from
bought and corrupted politicians and existing major parties. Membership
should be open to anti-racist anti-Zionists of all 'races' and religions.
To state the obvious, an new initiative of this type should not be at
the expense of attempting reform of existing parties.
Restoring Western Democracy
The USA, powerhouse of the real Evil Empire of our times, is the key.
Americans - the great majority of whom are decent people - can take democracy
back from the criminals who have hijacked the nation. But as well as the
unprecedented task of finding enough credible honest politicians to run
in 2004, uncorrupted by the Zionist machine, and fighting the unprecedented
battle of getting these enough votes in 2004 to expel the bulk of the
criminals from Congress and next Administration, there is one niggling
difficulty which will not go away of its own accord - and which can corrupt
the election itself.
Remember the 2002 mid-term 'elections'? There was no exit polling and
more than half of all votes counted were via 'no receipt' electronic voting
machines, installed by private companies with connections so sinister
that a science fiction author would have difficulty inventing the story
(11).
All true democrats in the USA must give top priority to preventing recurrence
of this travesty, with its obvious potential for untraceable corrupt practice.
'Count by hand in 2004!' must become a bumper sticker slogan now - not
a week before the election. In itself, that campaign would have enormous
educative value.
There has long been open season on proffering advice to the Palestinians
in Palestine. Every man and his dog has a few tips for them, so if they
fail to make the best of being on the receiving end of slow genocide,
it won't be for lack of suggestions from outsiders. Some, who claim to
be friends, say they should retain violence (12) as an option. Others
claim they should adopt the strategy of nonviolence (13) . Israel and
its American stooge tell them who is and isn't acceptable as their chief
negotiator. Other nations tell them to hold elections, Israel makes that
impossible - but still advises the subjects of its genocidal torture with
scarcely-concealed malicious glee how to make the most of their underclass
status. The onslaught of advice has become almost as frequent as the Israelis'
acts of physical violence.
In these circumstances, the offer of yet more advice from afar may seem
gratuitous. It may also seem flippant. But the following suggestions are
well meant - and put forward to as debating points to help advance the
Palestinian cause.
Growing a power-base for Palestine
One might say this is about leaning the fox's tricks and turning them
against him. The State of Israel has always been open to offering citizenship
to millions of people elsewhere in the world, as long as met various ideological,
tribal and religious criteria. Why not the Palestinians?
Palestinians could declare a form of honorary citizenship, complimentary
to holding other nationalities (that is, allowing for dual nationality).
To become a Palestinian citizen of this kind, residence or place of origin,
religion and 'race' would be irrelevant. Commitment to a free, demilitarized
non-racist Palestine would be the sole criteria. Commitments to citizenship
might include a form of a voluntary levy based on ability to pay. With
these funds - and with tens, possibly hundreds of millions of Palestinian
citizens - Palestine might start outgunning the Zionists in the court
of world public opinion. Perhaps Palestine needs its own global TV network?
Ending Holy Land Apartheid
The boundaries of the new Palestine? Here again, Palestinians could take
a tip from the pros. Israel has never enshrined its boundaries in any
legislative or constitutional form. Back in the 1950s, in an unguarded
moment, Israel's founding Prime Minister Ben Gurion explained the thinking
behind that:
"We were told not to try to speak to Ben Gurion, but when I saw him,
I asked why, since Israel is a democracy with a parliament, does it not
have a constitution? Ben Gurion said, "Look, boy"-I was 24 at the time-
"if we have a constitution, we have to write in it the border of our country.
And this is not our border, my dear." I asked, "Then where is the border?"
He said, "Wherever the Sahal will come, this is the border." Sahal is
the Israeli army." - Naeim Giladi (14)
Palestinians might take a similar approach. Their Palestine will be non-racist,
pluralistic, multicultural and demilitarized. They invite all Israeli
to join on that basis.
We suspect not many years would elapse before Israel collapsed from within,
as more and more ordinary decent Israelis became Palestinians, leaving
the racist maniacs isolated and in charge of nothing but their own appalling
failure.
The 'Violence' Question
I have a clear position on this, at least for people in 'western' democracies
where there is still real potential for nonviolent activism. Just say
NO!
We're not going to defeat this beast by making it stampede with rage,
smashing all under its gigantic trotters. The Zionization of the world
will not be undone by displaying its mirror image. It can only be overcome
by its true opposites. Anti-Zionists should promote liberty, justice,
mutual respect, mutual aid, nonviolence, honesty, decency and love. We
should promote the pursuit, not of hate, but of happiness, truth and reconciliation.
These are ways to vanquish Zionism, the most evil movement on earth and
the gravest threat humanity has ever faced.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) See this article by Professor A.K. Dewdney, for example.
(2) For a shocking recent confirmation of this thesis, see the interview
with lawyer Stanley Hilton.
(3) Many places to pick up the trail; Feral News Home Page is one starting
point. (4) An accumulation of references on this topic is HERE.
(5) See this remarkable debate between authors of the Jewish Tribal Review
and leading anti-Zionist Israel Shamir.
(6) Guardian Talkboard - check the 'International' section.
(7) There are many web references on this fast-evolving topic. Wired online
magazine maintains a useful page on privacy issues. There is little doubt
that most internet communications are not secure from the major 'western'
surveillance agencies - or from anyone with a 'back door' into that monitoring
such as the Israelis. (8) See this extract from Victor Ostrovsky's expose
on The Mossad, 'By Way of Deception'.
(9) 'Blame Yourself - American Power and Jewish Power' by Michael Neumann.
(10) See BlackBoxVoting.com and Rothschilds Family Part Owner Largest
Voting Machine Company for an introduction to this potentially decisive
scandal
(11) See the entry in the Encyclopedia Americana on the anti-Masonic Party.
"The Anti-Masonic Party was the first party to hold a nominating convention
and the first to announce a platform."
(12) See 'Israelis and Indians' by Michael Neumann
(13) An example of the advocacy of a nonviolent approach to Palestinian
resistance is 'A Nonviolent Intifada?' by Bassem Eid, Director of the
Palestinian Human Rights Monitoring Group.
(14) The Iraqi Jew by Naeim Giladi brilliantly documents the subversive
duplicity of Zionists and the UK towards the Iraqi people - of all religions
- over many decades.
|